One of the things Apple will do differently this year when it comes to its new iPhones is to install different amounts of RAM on the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 more. The iPhone 7 will have 2GB of RAM as its predecessor, while the iPhone 7 Plus will be bumped up to 3GB of RAM. This is what most reports claim, explaining that the camera features dual objective that will be on the phablet will require additional memory. But why Apple will not for massive upgrades RAM than its biggest rivals?
DO NOT MISS: Official: Samsung reminds Galaxy Note 7 in the world, announced a replacement program
Flagship Android devices ship with 4GB of RAM, while some device manufacturers have to 6GB of memory in a phone. One reason is that the iPhone probably does not need as much memory. The iPhone 6s with its 2GB of RAM is still faster than the combined double or triple memory because Apple did a great job to optimize software performance.
But another reason is that the RAM is expensive, and there is only so much to go around. And Apple loves his money.
A new report DRAMeXchange said that the price of RAM are on the rise as Apple was ramping up demand for the iPhone. As such, other devices will suffer.
"With the official launch of the next release of the iPhone on September 7, the entire chain is now offering smartphone in a critical period of intense-up stock activities." DRAMeXchange director April Wu said. "At the same time, there is still strong demand for Chinese smartphone brands of memory components, so the markets for DRAM and NAND flash experiencing tight supply."
It looks like Apple is planning carefully its RAM consumption. iPhone RAM demand is driving the rise in prices, something Apple does not want providers. So Apple is probably more interested in the iPhone 7 best performance without increasing the amount of RAM, if there is no reason to do so.
The report said the demand for servers has also recently heated, becoming another factor that explains the increase in DRAM prices, which means PC Power RAM has also tightened.
[ad_2]
Source link
0 comments:
Post a Comment