Last Monday we shared a video that showed a performance test between Samsung new Galaxy Note 7 years 6s against Apple iPhone. Instead of relying on benchmark tests to compare the two phones, this particular test used a different method to compare their performance when using the real world. The test was not scientific by any means, but the unique format does a pretty decent job of comparing the two phones in a real world environment. The assessment tests, after all, only truly test the capabilities of a smartphone when it is pushed to its limits. How many times you push your phone to its limits in the real world?
In this performance test above years the Apple iPhone clobbered positively brand-new Galaxy Note 7. Apple fans and Android fans have all been vocal enough on results since but does this test even not really matter
MUST SEE: Apple iPhone 8 will feature the radical overhaul we waited
video in question has already been viewed more than 1 million times, which shows you how this debate was intense. To put this in perspective, most other recent videos published by the same YouTube user each display statistics in the tens of thousands
This is the video in question :.
The methodology used here app turns to compare smartphone performance. The YouTuber opens the same set of applications one after another on both phones and the time how long the entire series - or "tower" - takes. He made two rounds with each phone and then compares the results.
In a word, the thought here is that this type of performance test paints a more accurate picture of how a smartphone performs in the real world. After all, you do not spend most of your time playing incredibly complex 3D games on your phone, you? No, you open applications, switching applications and perform simple tasks mostly
In this particular test, the iPhone 6s from 2015 has beaten all new Samsung Galaxy Note 7 by more than 40 seconds in the first round. - 1:22 6s have to complete the lap, while Note 7 to 2:05. As if that was not enough brutal beating, the gap widened to almost a full minute in the second round.
So ... iPhone of years with a dual-core processor and 2GB of RAM completely destroyed a brand new Android flagship phone with a quad-core chipset and 4GB of RAM. But is this really important?
There are certainly arguments on both sides of the fence but in the end, yes, it matters.
new Samsung Galaxy Note 7 is a fantastic smartphone. As we noted in our Galaxy Note 7 reviews last week, the equipment is phenomenal and features of specific software-Note is outstanding. However, one thing we brushed by and did not really dive in, is that the new Note 7 is not quite "new", so to speak. While the rating of the range Samsung has offered various improvements over year Galaxy S phones in the past, this year Samsung has decided to use the same waiting processor, camera, and other components of the Galaxy S7.
Is it such a bad thing? On its own, no, that's not a bad thing. Note 7 provides a very smooth user experience compared to other Android phones, and it has more than enough power to handle the heavy lifting.
But 6-month-old specs of the Samsung phone to draw attention to the fact that iOS is far smoother and more responsive than Android. As you can see from the year-old iPhone 6s Apple applications are lightning fast. There are a number of important factors that contribute to the silky smooth user experience of the iPhone as a powerful A9 chipset and custom optimizations in both third-party applications and iOS itself.
All this becomes much more important next month, when Apple launches its next generation of the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 more. Apple manages to make huge performance gains each year with its new iPhone and iPhone 6s of last year is already faster than any Android phone lighthouse by a landslide. The iPhone 7 will really be in a league of its own.
[ad_2]
Source link
0 comments:
Post a Comment