I have not been as active on Twitter recently as I was once, but I use the service to monitor continuously the news. Twitter lists are fantastic for the new observation. In fact, the lists have is probably the only reason I continue to use Twitter at all.
Tuesday night, crossed by a tweet timeline that drew my attention. "This is the nightmare scenario if Apple removes the headphone jack on the next iPhone, as rumored," warned the tweet. Ruh roh this tweet was "click me" written on it, and I could have jumped past he had entirely there was no source - Fast Company is a high quality website that I like personally. So I click.
the good news is that article led me to this tweet was not senseless click bait, as I had briefly feared might be the case. the bad news is that it describes a "nightmare scenario" that almost certainly is not based in reality.
DON 'T MISS: the Internet has completely lost over Trump "wall of rubbish" yesterday evening speech
the actual title of the article - "what really means the next iPhone For Music Copy protection" - is much less clicky , which probably explains why the text in this tweet was removed from the lede. The principle is relatively simple and, indeed, potentially scary enough.
We saw a lot of coverage of an iPhone 7 rumors, particularly in recent weeks. We heard rumblings for months that 2016 Apple iPhone models would ditch the 3.5mm headphone jack and opt instead to support a lightning headphones (or adapters lightning). A new wave of panic comes when the rumor surfaced, and it happened most recently last week.
My colleague wrote a message saying what many people are wrong about the rumor, but this new Fast Company article addresses things from another angle.
the "disaster scenario" the author describes is a return to the Digital Rights Management (DRM) in the music industry, this time manifest as physical restrictions on equipment helmet. The article paints a picture of a possible future where digital music legally purchased or streamed from paid services like Apple Music could play only on authorized helmet. The digital analog audio passage would this new wave of DRM
From the article :.
This is the nightmare scenario if Apple removes the headphone jack on the next iPhone, as rumor:
years from now, you will try to plug your phone into a high loudspeaker or set of headphones via the port of the iPhone lightning, and the music will not play. Maybe it's because the headphones are not allowed by Apple, or because your USB to Lightning cable uses a method of protection against the outdated copy. Whatever the case, you are now locked out of listening to the music you legally paid for hearing, a problem that does not exist in today's analog audio age.
This is a hypothetical situation, but the concern is not totally unfounded. If the headphone jack begins to disappear smartphones, digital sound replacement could include new digital rights management mechanisms. The only question is how this protection against copying will be applied.
is scary indeed, but it will not happen.
Consider why DRM exists in the first place and who stands to benefit in the scenario described above. The technology has been caused in an effort to fight against music piracy, which was rampant at the time. The beneficiaries were the record companies, music publishers and other rights holders who lose money every time a song was illegally downloaded for free. Using DRM allow these holders to restrict reading and to ensure that people listen to each track had actually paid for it ... in theory, at least.
Now, fast forward to leave to the dark future described by Fast Company . We do not even delve too deep to dismiss it completely.
This fact does not seem like something Apple would do, at least on the surface. Apple has already imposed restrictions on iPhone and iPad accessories through a compatibility program. Have you tried plugging your message phone only to get that annoying "This accessory can not be supported"? But in this case we speak of a certification program covering the accessories designed to work only with devices Apple, and they connect using only proprietary ports.
When headphones and speakers are concerned, there is a totally different story. who would benefit from DRM hardware that restricts playback of the way Fast Company suggested? labels and music publishers of the song? Nah. they are DRM music right there in the first place, but they do not sell headphones and they do not care what kind of headphones you use. They do not sell speakers. They sell music and DRM scenario would not protect at all. instead, it would protect Apple and other hardware vendors that sell headsets and high Speakers.
further complicate matters in this nightmare scenario is the wireless streaming technology. Exercise DRM, a digital cable connection is one thing, but Apple should also apply DRM when the user connects to a pair of Bluetooth headphones or a Bluetooth speaker for this scenario to make sense; there is no reason to allow DRM for a connection type and not the other. Again, this just will not happen.
There are valid reasons to be annoyed or even angry that Apple is probably ditching the audio jack of 3.5 mm on its future iPhones. If your current headphones have a 3.5mm plug, you will need to buy a converter dongle lightning or a Bluetooth adapter to continue using them. Or, you will need to buy new headphones that have a lightning card or connect wirelessly.
It is not ideal, but we have known for some time that Apple is willing to go against the grain to facilitate its designs. This is reflected most recently in the Retina MacBook, which has no standard USB port and uses only one USB port type C, so that Apple could make the thinnest laptop and more space for the battery in the square.
Prepare to be bored in September when Apple unveils new iPhone and they have not 3.5mm audio jacks. But rest assured that you will be able to use headphones you want when you take delivery of your new iPhone 7.
[ad_2]
Source link
0 comments:
Post a Comment